Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Smith v. Wagner et al
as 4:2012cv02473
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Smith
Defendant:
T. Wagner, S. Snider, Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Billy Smith v. Jeff Maitland, et al
as 12-5771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF MAITLAND, Chief Deputy Jailer, GIBSON COUNTY, CHUCK ARNOLD, Gibson County Sheriff and others
Robert Smith v. David Baker
as 12-6706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BAKER
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION HEALTH SERVICE UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD
Justin Smith v. Kaufman Cty Shrf Off, et al
as 12-10412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JUSTIN WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
CINDY MARTINEZ, Registered Nurse, Kaufman County Sheriff's Office
Elton Ortiz v. Lonnie Tisdale, et al
as 12-10330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELTON ZALOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE TISDALE, BILLY WILLIAMS, DAVID LOFTON and others
Davis v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv01676
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Wayne Smith, Rodney Slay, Dallas Lemoine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Secretary of CDCR, et al.
as 1:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
Frederick Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, K. Harrington, L.L. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maitland
as 1:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Maitland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 11-3124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, BILL CUMMINGS, Deputy Secretary of Corrections/Risk Management, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Smith v. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Smith
Defendant:
David Baker
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
