Cases 21 - 30 of 394
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Smith v. Weaver
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Myers v. Coker et al
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Shartarshea Deshawn Myers
Defendant:
E Coker, Shreveport Police Dept, Shamichael Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Davis
as 23-30060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
N. Davis, April Brown and Wayne Smith
Smith v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02991
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Smith
as 23-30051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Wayne Smith, Angela Harper, Officer Strawn and others
(PC) Smith v. Allison, et al.
as 1:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Christain Pfieffer, B. Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv05737
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Wayne Smith, Angela Harper, Officer Strawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
