Cases 1 - 10 of 1,235
Santos Perez et al v. Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv14138
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Santos Perez, Byron Eduardo Ordon Hernandez, Odaliz Esther Gomez Lopez and others
Defendant:
Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. and Harlan Bast
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. Sutton et al
as 1:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Deborah Alexander, Maud Maron and Noah Harlan
Defendant:
Tajh Sutton, Marissa Manzanares, David C. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARLAN v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02547
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
MINDY HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harlan v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2024cv03054
Petitioner:
Anthony Harlan
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harlan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner:
Cynthia Teresa Harlan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harlan et al v. REV Recreation Group Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kent S. Harlan and Kerri Kaye Harlan
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Camping World RV Sales, LLC and REV Recreation Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sam v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Harlan James Sam
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
