Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01804
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
William Armstrong
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Michael Gorbe, et al v. City of Lathrup Village, MI, et al
as 21-1532
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, SCOTT MCKEE and CITY OF LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON RUCKER and MICHAEL GORBE
ARMSTRONG, JR. v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2021cv08325
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00593
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, The, Dynax Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
William Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Saul
as 6:2020cv03222
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James William Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armstrong v. Saul
as 4:2020cv03222
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James William Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
