Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Norman v. Thompson et al
as 2:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Cory Norman
Defendant:
Bryan E. Thompson , William C. Lee , Greg Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhodes v. Linda et al
as 4:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Damaris June Rhodes
Defendant:
Christopher A Nuechterlein, James T Moody, Linda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Damaris June Rhodes
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Christopher A Nuechterlein, James T Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Lisa et al
as 3:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damaris June Rhodes
Defendant:
Lisa, William C Lee, Joseph Van Bokkelen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yaodi Hu v. William Lee
as 14-1975
Petitioner:
YAODI HU
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
AMTRAK, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, CITY OF WHITING, Indiana and others
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kawasaki Motors Finance Corporation v. TIFTON CYCLES INC et al
as 7:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kawasaki Motors Finance Corporation
Defendant:
TIFTON CYCLES INC, JOHN G ALDOUS, PATRICIA ALDOUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 5:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
John Ley, William T Moore, G R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyrus McNair v. William Lee
as 09-3067
Petitioner:
TYRUS MCNAIR
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lee, III et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
as 1:2009cv00450
Plaintiff:
William C. Lee, III and Michelle Lee
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Allstate Texas Lloyd's and Allstate Texas Lloyd's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
