Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
William Davis v. Richard Brown
as 13-2072
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: RICHARD BROWN
DAVIS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2013cv00185
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02144
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
DAVIS v. WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00102
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent: WARDEN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bullock v. Gracemore LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff: Connie Bullock
Defendant: Gracemore LLC and William C. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAVIS v. DUNCAN, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00262
Plaintiff: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Defendant: MARK J. DUNCAN and TRIAL AND ERRORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00257
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
as 2:2011cv00254
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2011cv00452
Plaintiff: CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Defendant: WILLIAM C. DAVIS and CATHERINE ANN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
William Davis v. USA
as 10-3969
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM C. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?