Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LEIBOWITZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv19970
Plaintiff:
LOUISE LEIBOWITZ and WILLIAM MOODY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOODY et al v. HOLIDAY CVS, L.L.C.
as 1:2020cv22483
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MOODY and JEANETTE MOODY
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOODY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43468
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inmates of Jackson County Jail K-Unit et al v. Mangum et al
as 2:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Sheriff Janis G. Mangum and Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Douglas Chellein, William Moody, David Britt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, William Moody, Deputy Warden Vivian Frazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Berryhill (CONSENT)
as 2:2018cv01004
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
William Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00362
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Moody v. Hamburg
as 9:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
William Moody
Defendant:
C.O. Hamburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Ronald King, Wendell Banks, Carrie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
