Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Woodburn v. Everquote, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10889
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Woodburn
Defendant:
Everquote, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodriguez v. Woodburn
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez and Chris Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Woodburn ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO NDTX***
as 6:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Andrew Woodburn v. Bryan Morrison
as 22-2084
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW FRANKLIN WOODBURN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Woodburn v. The General Automotive Insurance Services
as 2:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Woodburn
Defendant:
The General Automotive Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodriguez v. Woodburn
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodburn et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv04563
Not Classified By Court:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Billy Woodburn and Norma Woodburn
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Woodburn v. Union Square Media Group, LLC
as 1:2022cv22929
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Woodburn
Defendant:
Union Square Media Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
