Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DONALD L WALMER v. FRANK BISIGNANO
as 5:2025cv06715
Plaintiff:
DONALD L WALMER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
North v. Walmer
as 4:2024cv03585
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Sheri Walmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WALMER v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. WALMER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walmer Sazo Arevalo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2489
Petitioner:
WALMER SAZO AREVALO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brazeau et al v. City of San Ramon et al
as 3:2022cv07469
Plaintiff:
Bradley Brazeau, Nydia Brazeau and I. B., a minor
Defendant:
City of San Ramon, Sergeant John Cranford and Officer William Walmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salmeron v. Garland
as 22-6302
Petitioner:
WALMER SALMERON, Enrico Pallazo and Enrique Rosales
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Solomon Carter v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLOMON CARTER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, DONNA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KERI MOORE, Grievance Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SECURITY OFFICER POLITO and SECURITY OFFICER DOUGLAS POLITO
Salmeron v. Garland
as 22-6144
Petitioner:
WALMER SALMERON, Enrico Pallazo and Enrique Rosales
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pringle et al v. Pope et al
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Pringle and Thomas Walmer
Defendant:
Vicky L. Pope and Wayne T. Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
