Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walter v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09414
Plaintiff:
Sanders Walter, II
Defendant:
Antony John Blinken, Janet Louise Yellen, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Regjion Jones et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv05635
Plaintiff:
Regjion Jones and Walter Sanders
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Magdy Shamoonabras Kanace and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
National Railroad Passenger, et al v. Cimarron Crossing Feeders
as 19-3071
Not Yet Classified:
DONYEL PHILLIPS, DEBORAH KRAUTH, STEFAN WEISSER and others
Defendant:
CIMARRON CROSSING FEEDERS, LLC
Sanders v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Walter Sanders
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Railroad Passenger Corp. et al v. Cimarron Crossing Feeders, LLC. et al
as 6:2016cv01094
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. and BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Cimarron Crossing Feeders, LLC. , National Railroad Passenger Corporation and BNSF Railway Company
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Ramona Vreeland , Diane Clark , Glory Penington and others
Intervenor_defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sanders v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04124
Petitioner:
Walter Sanders, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Greene County Georgia v. Boyd
as 3:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Greene County Georgia
Defendant:
Raymond O Boyd
Thirdparty_defendant:
Walter Sanders
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Raymond O Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Walter Sanders, Jr.
as 10-13667
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALTER SANDERS, JR.
USA v. Walter Sanders
as 09-10199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALTER SANDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
