Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Woods v. Vohra Wound Physicians of FL, LLC
as 1:2020cv01958
Defendant:
Vohra Wound Physicians of FL, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wanda Woods
Woods v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14100
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wanda Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14087
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Sun Pharma Global FZE and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PORTER, DIONNE REISERT, SHARON L. REITER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer et al v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01243
Plaintiff:
Annette Porter, Dionne Reisert, Sharon L. Reiter and others
Defendant:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Cross et al
as 2:2018cv11639
Plaintiff:
Diana Baker and Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Barbara L. Cross, Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods and others
Baker v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv11234
Plaintiff:
Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods, Brian Popour and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-22382
Plaintiff:
Wanda Woods King and Christopher Noel King
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
King et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22382
Plaintiff:
Wanda Woods King and Christopher Noel King
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
