Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Gray v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02197
Petitioner:
Jaquavius Laquan Gray
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrington v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2022ct03353
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Medical Center and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brewer v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02119
Petitioner:
Bryan L. Brewer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00333
Petitioner:
Ted Bell
Respondent:
State of Texas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yazzie v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022hc02063
Petitioner:
Donovan Yazzie
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fiorito v. Thomas
as 0:2022cv00797
Petitioner:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAPOZZI v. GUBBIOTTI et al
as 1:2022cv01659
Petitioner:
FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS GUBBIOTTI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURZIKE v. SPEAR et al
as 3:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
SPEAR, CARR, NURSE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
