Cases 1 - 10 of 42
GARY v. KNIFE et al
as 1:2025cv01044
Plaintiff:
BRONAL GARY
Defendant:
KATHLEEN WOODEN KNIFE, ELIZABETH LISA WHITE PIPE, TONIA MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11949
Plaintiff:
Jazemine Adams, Haylee Adams, Edward Allahand and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hatcher v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Lashandra Hatcher
Defendant:
Jonathan Wayne Boyd, USAA General Indemnity Co and Garrison Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Chuck BoydIn re: Chuck Boyd
as 23-10705
Petitioner:
In re: CHUCK WAYNE BOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Chuck Boyd
as 23-10399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHUCK WAYNE BOYD
Shell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Shell v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00040
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Thomas v. Stevens et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Earl Thomas
Defendant:
John B Stevens, Daniel Wayne Boyd, Kevin S Laine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
