Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Cooke v. Shapiro
as 24-86
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYNE COOKE
Defendant:
MILONE & MACBROOM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL SHAPIRO, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman and member of the Town of Branford inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency a/k/a Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission f/k/a Inland Wetlands Agency and DIANA ROSS, Individually and in her official capacity as Inland Environment Director of the Town of Branford
Galls LLC v. Cook et al
as 5:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Galls LLC
Defendant:
Wayne Cook and North America Fire Equipment Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COOK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13995
Plaintiff:
JODY WAYNE COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37139
Plaintiff:
MIKE WAYNE COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Cook
as 21-10387
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Wayne Cook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Vann v. City of Wichita Falls et al
as 7:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Danny Castillo, Jared Venable, Danny Dewayne Atnip and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Vann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76990
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WAYNE COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Anthony Cooks
as 19-10672
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY WAYNE COOKS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cooke v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2019cv00371
Defendant:
Milone & Macbroom, Inc., Diana Ross and Daniel Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cooks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv02695
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Cooks
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
