Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GARDNER v. MOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv01422
Defendant:
FARLEY, MCCANE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
IAN WAYNE GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Medical Director T.J. Powell and Sheriff Mike Griffis
Plaintiff:
Corey Wayne Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Darryl Gardner, Jr.
as 16-16284
Petitioner:
In re: DARRYL WAYNE GARDNER, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gardner v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00551
Petitioner:
Darryl Wayne Gardner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
National Standard Company v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
National Standard Company
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company , Cecil E Aldridge , Katrina Lee and others
Counter_claimant:
Federal Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
National Standard Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Gardner v. Ray Hobbs
as 14-2789
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gary Wayne Gardner
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Gardner v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gardner
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Gardner v. Unites States of America
as 3:2012cv01210
Petitioner:
Darryl Wayne Gardner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gary Gardner v. Roy Hobbs, et al
as 11-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary Wayne Gardner
Defendant - Appellee:
Roy Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services and others
Gardner v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Gardner
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
