Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pawochawog-Mequinosh v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Wolf Pawochawog-Mequinosh and Brian Keith Brownell
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury, William . Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassone v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1053
Plaintiff:
GARY TASSONE
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., NANCY RUOTOLO HULL, DOROTHY KRUCK and others
Benbow v. Officer Carnavale et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow and Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant:
Officer Carnavale, Lt. Amaral, Deputy Warden Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
