Cases 31 - 40 of 7,373
Elena Saville v. Clarence Webb, et al
as 24-10998
Plaintiff:
ELENA LYADINA SAVILLE
Defendant:
CLARENCE WILLIAM WEBB, ROBERT ALLEN WHITWORTH, RANDY CLARENCE HOPPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Webb et al v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Webb and Donna Webb
Defendant:
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Young v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Young
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, . Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muzumala v. City of New York
as 24-806
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRONXWORKS, PROJECT RENEWAL and others
Mosley v. Reiser
as 24-60148
Plaintiff:
Roy Campanella Mosley
Defendant:
Steven Reiser, Warden, K. Lemos, Camp Administrator and B. Webbs, Case Manager
Ghusain v. Webb et al
as 3:2024cv01863
Plaintiff:
Ameer Ghusain
Defendant:
Peter Webb, Wayne Richardson, Scott Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Webb v. Mckinley
as 0:2024cv60473
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
Gamer Mckinley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colonial Webb Contractors Company v. Hill Phoenix, Inc.
as 24-1237
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL WEBB CONTRACTORS COMPANY
Defendant:
HILL PHOENIX, INC.
Entergy Arkansas, LLC v. Doyle Webb, et al
as 24-1586
Plaintiff:
Entergy Arkansas, LLC
Defendant:
Doyle Webb, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, Katie Anderson, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and Justin Tate, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Arkansas Public Service Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
