Cases 1 - 10 of 190
USA v. Daniel Wert
as 24-10127
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL WERT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Stirling et al
as 6:2023cv05150
Plaintiff:
Quinteris Z. Miller and Quinteris Zy
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Dominic Boccabello, A. W. Werts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Werts et al v. Cabot Lodge Securities, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANN LOUISE WERTS and DAN WERTS
Defendant:
CABOT LODGE SECURITIES, CRAIG GOULD, Cabot Lodge Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Brinkman et al v. Place et al
as 3:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Chad Brinkman, Karissa Hoersten and Maureen Rentz
Defendant:
Amos J. Place, Jeffrey E. Rex, Detective Nathan Huebner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. S.C. Dept. of Mental Health et al
as 5:2023cv01077
Defendant:
Wellpath Recovery Solutions, S.C. Dept. of Mental Health, Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Werts v. DeJoy
as 22-11045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Werts, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis DeJoy
USA v. Taurian Werts
as 22-13432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TAURIAN JAVON WERTS
Werts v. DeJoy
as 22-10973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Werts, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lewis DeJoy, United States Postmaster General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
