Cases 11 - 20 of 36
James Johnson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-1760
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Wesley Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Johnson v. Kelly et al
as 5:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Charles Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
James Gibson , William Kirk and Connie Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Johnson v. Theo Glover, et al
as 14-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THEO GLOVER, DEVLIN JOSEPH SCHOOP, GREGORY ROBERT JAMES, JR. and others
Johnson v. Kennedy
as 4:2014cv00413
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
Chelsea Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Glover et al
as 3:2014cv50129
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr. and Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
Theo Glover, Devlin J. Schoop, Gregory R. James, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. State of Maryland
as 1:2013cv03334
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen, Keenan K. Cofield and John Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keenan Cofield et al. v. State of Maryland
as 13-7352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN KESTER COFIELD, JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON and MICHAEL ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cofield et al v. State of Maryland
as 1:2013cv01839
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield, John Wesley Johnson and Michael Allen
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. St. Marys Correctional Center et al
as 5:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Keith Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
St. Mary's Correctional Center, Karen Townsend, Wexford Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cornforth et al
as 3:2013cv50117
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
Rick Cornforth and Illinois Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
