Cases 11 - 20 of 24
United States of America v. Robinson (Miles)
as 11-5126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wesley Robinson, AKA Wesley Robertson, AKA Wes
Defendant - Appellant:
Deshawn Miles, AKA Now Later
Travis Davidson v. Robert Ratliff
as 11-7499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS LEON DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT RATLIFF, NICOLE MACE and WESLEY ROBINSON
Davidson v. Ratliff et al
as 4:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Travis Leon Davidson
Defendant:
Robert Ratliff, Nicole Mace and Wesley Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Robinson et al
as 4:2010cv03106
Plaintiff:
Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
H Wesley Robinson and National Legal Professional Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. John Robinson, Jr.
as 10-5176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY ROBINSON, JR.
Ahmad et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02612
Plaintiff:
Indris S. Ahmad, Donald R. Andress, Edmund A. Arnado and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas et al v. Ratliff et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas, Charmaine Douglas and Carlos Davis
Defendant:
Robert A. Ratliff, H. Wesley Robinson, Mark Konerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy Thomas v. Natl' Legal Professional Assoc, et al
as 09-7015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Roy Thomas
Defendant - Appellant:
National Legal Professional Associates, H. Wesley Robinson and Charles Alex Murray
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osbourne v. Ratliff et al
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Derwin Osbourne
Defendant:
Robert Ratliff, Matthew M. Robinson, H. Wesley Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
