Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Murray v. Ferrara et al
as 2:2015cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wesley Thomas Murray
Defendant:
Thomas A. Ferrara, A. Simmons and Tomasik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv00625
Petitioner:
Robert Wesley Thomas
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hysell v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Wesley-Thomas Hysell
Defendant:
Lou Archuleta, Ron Wager, Rick Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ronald Thoma
as 13-3609
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD WESLEY THOMAS
Wade v. Thomas
as 6:2013cv02138
Plaintiff:
Tyron C Wade
Defendant:
Wesley Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moore et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02372
Plaintiff:
Felicia G. Moore , Holly D. Moorere , Demetria L. Morris and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00325
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RONALD WESLEY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James Caouette, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 12-80160
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAMES CAOUETTE, JESUS CERVANTES, EMILY CERVANTES and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Caouette et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv01814
Plaintiff:
James Caouette , Jesus Cervantes , Emily Cervantes and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOWE et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62108
Plaintiff:
WESLEY THOMAS LOWE and OPAL LOWE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , M. H. DETRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
