Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Snyder v. City of Portage et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
James E Snyder
Defendant:
City of Portage, Schmidt, Whitten & Whitten LLC, Daniel Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HYBRID PHARMA LLC v. Knispel et al
as 0:2022cv61136
Plaintiff:
HYBRID PHARMA LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Knispel, Mark Whitten and Robert Difiore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Michael Faust et al
as 2:2021cv01977
Plaintiff:
Keyandia Valetta Campbell
Defendant:
Michael Faust, Arizona Department of Child Safety, Christopher Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Cannon et al
as 4:2021cv02586
Plaintiff:
Tommy Whitten
Defendant:
Mark Cannon and HARRIS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TD Development, LLC v. City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Steven Dixon, Connie Fitch, Jay Hovey and others
Plaintiff:
TD Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Whitten et al v. Rochester Township Republican Central Committee et al
as 3:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
Darin Whitten, William D. Kaiser, Dorothy Taft and others
Defendant:
Don Gray, Rochester Township Republican Central Committee, Thomas K. Munroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Whitten et al
as 2:2020cv01099
Defendant:
Francis Whitten, The City of Las Cruces doing business as The Las Cruces Police Department and Thaddeus Allen
Plaintiff:
Mark Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panicaro v. Storey County et al
as 3:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Eric Kern, Storey, County of, Gerald Antinoro and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Panicaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nebavi v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Julio Perez, Nathan Whitten, Lee Pinto and others
Plaintiff:
Egnifinh Cedrik Nebavi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
