Cases 61 - 70 of 237
Gibson v. City of Sturgis, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tonja Gibson
Defendant:
City of Sturgis, Kentucky , Sturgis, Kentucky Police Department , Duane Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bric v. Humphreys County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bric
Defendant:
Humphreys County Tennessee and Humphreys County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Daugherty et al
as 2:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Thacker
Defendant:
Ty Daugherty and Campbell County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Shelby County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2017cv02072
Plaintiff:
Danizel Hines
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Bill Oldham, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbro v. Leibach et al
as 1:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yarbro
Defendant:
Hardin County Sheriff's Department and Jason Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Hart
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department and Gatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stancliff v. Notgrass et al
as 3:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Patricia Susan Stancliff
Defendant:
Taylor Jordan Notgrass and Rutherford County Sheriff's Department of Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lechner v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Francis Lechner
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Marquette County Board of Commissioners, Gerald O. Corkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbro v. Leibach et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yarbro
Defendant:
Hardin County Sheriff's Department and Jason Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
