Cases 1 - 10 of 1,713
Milton v. State of Texas 272nd District Court et al
as 4:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Emanuel A. Milton
Defendant:
State of Texas 272nd District Court, Brazos County District Attorney, Officer Maldanado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMUELS v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05416
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milton v. Osborn CI et al
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marcus Milton
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1445 Immigration: Application for Naturalization
Grayson v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Milton D. Grayson, Jr.
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
