Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dohrman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Duane Dohrman, Donald McCain, Joanne McMahon and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dyer v. Lee et al
as 1:2018cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jamie Dyer
Defendant:
William Alfred Lee, IV and Patrick Wayne Nickens, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Clarke
as 1:2016cv01132
Petitioner:
William Henry Lee
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04338
Plaintiff:
Lynn M. Lee and William R. Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lee v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2012cv01987
Plaintiff:
William Edward Lee, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Steven Glenn: Johnson
Defendant:
Scott E. Thomas, Sarah M. Kirkman, J. B. Stroud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
William J. Lee, Sr. and Shirley Lee
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fernandez v. Blades et al
as 1:2007cv03315
Plaintiff:
Robert Fernandez
Defendant:
Matthew G. Blades and William S. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
