Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Booth et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2025cv02099
Plaintiff:
William Booth and Judith Booth
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Roland v. Booth et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Susan Roland
Defendant:
Savannah J Booth, Allison Brinkhaus and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Booth v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
William Booth, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-10937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM BOOTH, RODERICK BROWN, DAVID CHADWICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Bradley Sanders, et al v. Ajanta Pharma USA, Inc., et al
as 23-10640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY SANDERS, MARSHA SHOW, SHIRLEY BROWE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AJANTA PHARMA USA, INC., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
BOOTH v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv05276
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOOTH and REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Franson, et al
as 21-1022
Defendant / Appellee:
MARLIN, ASHLEY FRANSON, DARRELL SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Franson et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Johnson, Ryder May, Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. William Boothe, III
as 20-2635
Defendant / Appellant:
William Boothe, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Johnson v. Franson et al
as 1:2020cv00923
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Ashley Franson and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
