Cases 1 - 10 of 34
DAVIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Duster et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Duster, Gary Michael Cummings, John Page Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Davis et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00652
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
William Davis and Titiana Bartul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis v. Bowers
as 3:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
William Davis
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00640
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv01596
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roepnack v. Woodson et al
as 5:2019cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mr. Paul Roepnack
Defendant:
Mr. David Rainer, Mr. William Davis and Mr. W. Randolph Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00930
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
