Cases 31 - 40 of 298
Montez v. Hudson et al
as 1:2020cv04215
Defendant:
William G. Roecker, David Astrow and Nathalina Hudson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Montez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shorts v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00975
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Arizona, State of, Michael K Jeanes and others
Plaintiff:
Challyne-Atryus Bre'Shan Shorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Gregory et al
as 1:2020cv00521
Defendant:
Jenkins, Tyrone Montague, Ann Felton and others
Plaintiff:
William G. Greene, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Bosworth, Jr et al
as 3:2020cv00316
Defendant:
William G Mason, Bryan Patrick McGako, Dale Hannah and others
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wayne Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #807918 v. Ulberg et al
as 1:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Unknown Knott, Unknown Minnick, Tom Burnewell and others
Plaintiff:
Kiyel Justin Johnson #807918
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Mason et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
William G Mason, William G Bosworth, Bryan Patrick Mcgacko and others
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wayne Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grantham v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05856
Plaintiff:
Scott Eugene Grantham
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, William G Montgomery and Unknown Gan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams #253141 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05732
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, John McTernan, Douglas Gerlach and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill #276083 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05713
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan, William G Montgomery and others
Petitioner:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris #476889 v. Kitchka et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant:
Christopher Becker, Erin Kitchka, William G. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Devonte Harris #476889
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
