Cases 11 - 20 of 492
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03765
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
(PS) Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02843
Defendant:
Alling & Jillson, LTD, El Dorado County Superior Court, David L. DeVore and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Knox Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Livent Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Livent Corporation, Pierre R. Brondeau, Robert C. Pallash and others
DONLEY v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2023cv21818
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES DONLEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv01982
Petitioner:
Henry William Johnson, II
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Le v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08364
Plaintiff:
Phuong Le
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William Johnson, Todd Lachman and others
Johnson v. Officer Myers et al
as 6:2023cv04476
Plaintiff:
Charles William Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Myers, Mail Room Personnel and Kirkland R and E Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lorenzen et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv01829
Defendant:
Brett Johnson, Brett William Johnson, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lorenzen and Diane Lorenzen
William Johnson v. FMCSA
as 23-2900
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
