Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Lawrence Moore & Ogar, et al
as 10-3638
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MOORE & OGAR, Successor in interest to Lawrence Moore Ogar & Jacobs, PAUL LAWRENCE, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Williams Lawrence, deceased, FRED MOORE, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TARA CONKLIN and SNYDER & SNYDER AGENCY, INCORPORATED
Ottero et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 8:2010cv02820
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Key Corporate Capital, Inc., William Lawrence WHITEHEAD, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Ottero and Savannah Ottero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. William Billow
as 10-50486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE BILLOW, AKA William Lawrence Billows
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010mc00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
USA v. W. LeNeve
as 10-13471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
W. LAWRENCE LENEVE, a.k.a. Larry LeNeve, a.k.a. William Lawrence Leneve
USA v. William Jone
as 09-50328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE JONES
United States v. Lawrence
as 09-5092
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE, JR.
Satterwhite v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00184
Petitioner:
William Lawrence Satterwhite
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sanford et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2008cv00835
Plaintiff:
Terry Richard Sanford, Terry Richard Sanford, Barbara Frances Sanford and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Willie B. Fuller, [First Name Unknown] Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
