Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marks v Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 4:2018cv03552
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Compay of the Midwest
Plaintiff:
William Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Cox et al v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2013cv02288
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Cox , Beverly Hawley , Richard Hawley and others
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Cox et al v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2013cv01608
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Cox , Richard Hawley , Beverly Hawley and others
Garnishee:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Continental Casualty Company v. Duyzend et al
as 2:2013cv01508
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Henri F. Duyzend, Sharon Duyzend, Kathryn Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espinoza v. Companion Commercial Insurance Company et al
as 7:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
Dario Espinoza
Defendant:
Companion Commercial Insurance Company , Wellington Claim Service, Inc. and William Mark Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Scott v. Enterprise Financial Services Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
William Mark Scott
Defendant:
Enterprise Financial Services Corp., Peter F. Benoist and Frank H. Sanfilippo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Alan Carney v. Home Instead, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10184
Defendant:
Home Instead, Inc. and William Mark Sibbernsen
Plaintiff:
Alan Carney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Precision Franchising LLC v. B.W. Technical Training, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
B.W. Technical Training, Inc. and William Mark Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Design Packaging, Inc. v. Boyd et al
as 1:2007cv02885
Plaintiff:
Design Packaging, Inc. and Design Packaging, Inc.
Defendant:
William Mark Boyd and Xact Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
