Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Rydbom v. McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rydbom
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Derek McKinney, William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Feck et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Defendant:
Huttonsville Correctional Center, Shelby Searls, William Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcelis Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Defendant:
Russell Maston, William Marshall, III and Jim Justice
Plaintiff:
Jason G. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. Richards Building Supply Co.
as 3:2024cv01528
Plaintiff:
William Marshall and Theresa Marshall
Defendant:
Richards Building Supply Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03008
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelemen v. Hamlin, et al.
as 24-1906
Plaintiff:
JASON JOSEPH KELEMEN
Defendant:
JOHN HAMLIN, WILLIAM MARSHALL, EVELYN CANTENO and others
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farr v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farr
Defendant:
William Marshall, Pruntytown Correctional Center, Psimed Corrections, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beardsley et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brendan Beardsley, Nicole Hollner, Susan Traver and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kelemen v. Hamlin et al
as 6:2023cv01916
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Kelemen
Defendant:
John Hamlin, William Marshall, Melanie McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
