Cases 21 - 30 of 86
ELANSARI v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv04000
Defendant:
ADAM RAHUBA, RYAN MATICOLLA, AGENT LUKE CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAVANAGH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02163
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Adams v. Semcken et al
as 1:2020cv11954
Defendant:
Julie A. Gafkay, Barry Rumble, Fred L. Borchard and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv22722
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Attorney General William P. Barr, DONALD J TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2020cv02469
Defendant:
Sherri A. Lydon, Internal Revenue Service and William P Barr
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Harold Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00573
Defendant:
MARTIN B. MCGEE, KEVIN PFISTER, JAMES ROMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01620
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JOHN POES (1-100), WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROTH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUCHANAN et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01542
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY FIELD, ANN DAGRIN and RADIYA BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT BOND, J.N.C., KISHON MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
