Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Parker v. Barnett et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charlie William Parker
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Barnett, Officer 31 and Officer J 6
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bratcher v. Rabideau
as 1:2019cv01865
Defendant:
Karen Rabideau, Stateville Correctional Center and William Parker
Plaintiff:
Terry S. Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Cagle et al
as 3:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
William Parker
Defendant:
Blaine Cagle, Zach Croker and Greene County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Berghuis
as 2:2015cv11842
Petitioner:
Matthew William Parker
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zaball et al v. Benbow et al
as 1:2013cv03511
Plaintiff:
Jose Zaball, Marvin Sanders, Alfonso Duran and others
Defendant:
Benbow, Phillips, Yousuf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Benbow et al
as 1:2013cv03514
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robinson, Jose Zaball, Marvin Sanders and others
Defendant:
Benbow, Phillips, Yousuf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06365
Plaintiff:
Marvin Sanders, Darvell Jones, Alfonso Duran and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, The City Department of Correctional Services, (GRVC) Sercurity Oversea and Personnel Erea Supervisor John Doe or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Schaffer et al
as 5:2008cv06087
Plaintiff:
Charles William Parker
Defendant:
Keith Schaffer and Mary Attebury
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Parker v. Terry McCann
as 08-1572
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM PARKER
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MCCANN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
