Cases 21 - 30 of 31
COACH, INC. et al v. 1488 RAHWAY AVENUE REALTY, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00795
Plaintiff:
COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
1488 RAHWAY AVENUE REALTY, LLC , JOHN PETTY , WILLIAM PETTY and others
Cross_claimant:
JOHN PETTY , WILLIAM PETTY and 1488 RAHWAY AVENUE REALTY, LLC
Cross_defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, XIAO YUN WU, MIN YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Petty vs. O'Brien
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Robert William Petty
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Petty et al
as 1:2010cv03842
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Charles William Petty, II, Visionary Publishing International, LLC and Virtual Properties Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Valdez v. Petty et al
as 1:2010cv00631
Plaintiff:
Bertha Valdez
Defendant:
William Petty and Leonard Armijo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robert Petty v. Stephanie Rush, et al
as 10-5600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PETTY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHANIE RUSH, LISA GREGORY, MARK DIXON and others
Petty v. Cross
as 2:2009cv00100
Petitioner:
Robert William Petty
Respondent:
James Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Petty v. Stephanie Rush, et al
as 08-6269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PETTY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHANIE RUSH, LISA GREGORY, MARK DIXON and others
Robert Petty v. Stephanie Rush, et al
as 08-6084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PETTY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHANIE RUSH, LISA GREGORY, MARK DIXON and others
Petty v. Driver et al
as 8:2008cv02301
Petitioner:
Robert William Petty
Respondent:
Joe D. Driver and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
