Cases 41 - 50 of 148
Williams v. Reitz et al
as 1:2018cv02102
Respondent:
Warden Earl Reitz and Cumberland County Prison
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reade, Jr v. Warren et al
as 1:2018cv12200
Defendant:
Elected Officials of ; Newton, Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Lawrence as Santuaries Cites, William William Galvin, Maura Healey and others
Plaintiff:
William Reade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prince et al
as 3:2018cv01675
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Scott Prince, Jacqueline Lashbrook and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Toomey et al
as 1:2018cv01687
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Allen Welch, Michael Halkias and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Baker, John William Williams and Nathaniel Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Williams v. James Salmonson
as 18-35591
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES SALMONSON
Bowen v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv02486
Plaintiff:
David B. Bowen
Defendant:
Deanna Williams and William Williams , Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burns v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00231
Defendant:
Boon-Sharp, Ms. Clay, Jesse Cox and others
Plaintiff:
David Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Salmonson
as 9:2018cv00050
Petitioner:
William Williams
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diangson et al v. Salmonson
as 6:2018cv00035
Petitioner:
Franz Diangson, Danny Severson, Greyson Keeney and others
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
