Cases 21 - 28 of 28
DANIELS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv46648
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANIELS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
William Adams v. City of Ormond Beach, et al
as 11-11792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, a municipal corporation, JOHN DOE NETTERVILE, Badge #51, police officer, GREGORY STOKES, police officer and others
POLK v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79615
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANIEL POLK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Stokes, et al
as 6:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
City of Ormond Beach, Michael Longfellow, Ormond Beach Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Faden et al
as 3:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Willie Daniel
Defendant:
Barbara E. Fowler, Thad Fletcher and David Spires
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Vriezelaar et al
as 4:2010cv00967
Plaintiff:
Willie Daniel and Betty Daniel
Defendant:
Stanley Vriezelaar and American Multispecialty Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ables et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05597
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Yvonne Ables, Stephanie Yvonne Ables, Stephanie Yvonne Ables and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ables et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Yvonne Ables, Stephanie Yvonne Ables, All Plaintiffs and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
