Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv62197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00130
Respondent:
Hazelton FCI Warden H. Ray
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods and Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willie Woods v. H. Ray
as 23-6565
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE PERRY WOODS
Respondent / Appellee:
H. RAY, Warden FCI Hazelton
Woods v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PERRY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05884
Plaintiff:
WILLIE PERRY, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv10381
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35331
Plaintiff:
WILLIE PERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate #145822 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Curtis Tate #145822 and Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, US Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perry v. Parker et al
as 1:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
Willie Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams, Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02854
Plaintiff:
Willie Perry
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
