Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lane v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00811
Petitioner:
Willie Lane
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. CHAMBERS et al
as 5:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LANE
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PASHION CHAMBERS, AUDRA HARRISON, DOCTOR ENI NWABUEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berg v. Knox County, Tennessee et al (PLR3)
as 3:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Charme Allen, Knox County, Tennessee, Willie Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Darren V. Berg and Katheryn D. Bradley Berg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane
Defendant:
Ron Neal, G Payne and Dawn Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulley v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane Pulley
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Heath Delaney and Collins Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03358
Plaintiff:
Mattie Lane and Willie Lane
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-03358
Plaintiff:
Mattie Lane and Willie Lane
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
James Boone v. Randal Nichols, et al
as 12-30389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL NICHOLS, WILLIE LANE, ERIC COUNTS and others
Boone v. Nicholes et al
as 2:2012cv00150
Defendant:
Randal Nicholes, Willie Lane, Eric Champes and others
Plaintiff:
James M Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2010cv02118
Plaintiff:
Willis Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
