Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, DAWN N. ISON, DIANE NICOLE PRINC and others
Martin v. Lincoln County Jail
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley Martin
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Lincoln County Jail Administration, Lincoln County Jail Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv10138
Plaintiff:
Kevin La'von Giles
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dawn Ison, Diane N. Princ and others
Woodard #650305 v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Norman Dennis Woodard #650305
Defendant:
Unknown Miller, Unknown Minerick, Unknown Bastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03962
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Woodard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washington #239592 v. Farber et al
as 1:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
Willie Washington #239592
Defendant:
Mattew Farber, Andrew Streit, Unknown Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amacher v. City of Tullahoma, Tennessee et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jenna Amacher
Defendant:
City of Tullahoma, Tennessee, Jennifer Moody, Ray Knowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodard v. Shillingsford et al
as 2:2023cv11611
Plaintiff:
DeAndrew D. Woodard
Defendant:
Shillingsford and Gilbert
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woodard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Woodard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
