Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Max-George v. Oath
as 23-40253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecil Walter Max-George, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Oath, Incorporated, also known as Yahoo!, Incorporated and Verizon Communications, Incorporated
FREDERICK v. BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
SYLVANIA FREDERICK III and SYLVANIA FREDERICK, III
Defendant:
BATHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BLVD MANNER, HAMPTON PLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aloba v. Yahoo Inc.
as 4:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
Oriyomi Aloba, Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba and Oriyomi Sadia Aloba
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. YAHOO! INC.
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON
Defendant:
YAHOO! INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. DELBECQ et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Defendant:
MIREILLE DELBECQ and YAHOO! INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Microsoft, Yahoo! and others
Plaintiff:
James McArthur Washington, Jr., Justine Marie Caridad Washington and Artistic J's Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Google et al
as 4:2019cv04433
Defendant:
Instagram, Pennzoil, Mobil and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02632
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Yahoo Inc, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Atwood, II v. John Lyons, et al
as 15-60262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN LYONS, AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED, YAHOO, INCORPORATED and others
Jones v. Fox Network et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Fox Network, USA Today, Washington Post and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
