Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Alexander v. Higgins et al
as 4:2026cv00856
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Alexander
Defendant:
Eric Higgins and Does D-Unit Officers; Maintenance Men; All Deputies, Pulaski Cty. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judkins (PS) v. Men on Mission LLC et al
as 1:2026cv03790
Plaintiff:
Adam Judkins
Defendant:
Men on Mission LLC and Jonathan Mather
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gentile v. Club Men 1 Inc et al
as 0:2026cv62254
Plaintiff:
Stephen James Gentile
Defendant:
Club Men 1 Inc doing business as Club Men Salon and Spa and Ellis Eliahu Bagiv
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
