Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nicolas Crespin v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1952
Petitioner:
NICOLAS PALACIOS CRESPIN
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00717
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Paraluman
as 26-50606
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Michael Cole Johnson
Defendant:
Emariz Orbasido Paraluman, Erika Claridad Paraluman, Wipro, Limited and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04104
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04606
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marron et al v. Moros et al
as 8:2026mc00029
Defendant:
The Cartel of The Suns, Nicolas Maduro Moros, Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia ("FARC") and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Eduardo Marron, Maria Marron, C. R, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Cameron v. Garland
as 26-1918
Plaintiff:
GILBERT O. CAMERON
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, D.A. DARCEL DENISE CLARK, A.D.A. BRUCE BIRNS and others
Nicolas v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2026cv13218
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nicolas
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terrance Johnson, II v. Nicolas Estes
as 26-6763
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JOHNSON, II
Defendant:
NICOLAS ESTES, ANTHONY CASH and TYREE DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
