Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Aghasili et al v. EDLOW et al
as 8:2026cv02550
Plaintiff:
Chukwuemeka Aghasili, Amal Aguirre, Hatem Al-Harazi and others
Defendant:
Director JOSEPH EDLOW, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Markwayne Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
United States of America v. Najibullah
as 26-1685
Defendant:
AKHUND ZADA, HAJI NAJIBULLAH, Amir Ashraf and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04157
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Kinhoun v. Hatam-Zada et al
as 4:2026cv00318
Plaintiff:
Monica Kinhoun
Defendant:
Chingiz Hatam-Zada and Furu Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zada v. People of the State of New York
as 26-454
Petitioner:
AMER ZADA
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alvarez et al v. Lucid Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
Raul Alvarez, Samantha Fuentes and Zada Alvarez
Defendant:
Leonel Recinos, MAJ Transport, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Company Inc
Intervenor:
Anabel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
