Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Balode v. INK 477, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv23614
Plaintiff:
Zanda Balode
Defendant:
INK 477, LLC and Fadi Abdulnour
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66105
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZANDA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv08022
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Zanda Lee Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BASS et al v. CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA
as 3:2016cv00309
Defendant:
CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
AARON BASS , DAVID BAKER , ARWEN BHE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AKPENEYE et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
TEJERE J. AKPENEYE , SALI ALPHAEK , JACQUES V. ALSTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 15-1464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
Thomas et al v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2014cv07513
Plaintiff:
Tevon Thomas, Dwyte Pilgrim, Alishea Walters and others
Defendant:
Alfredo Skelton, Joebian Ortiz, City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Michael Lumer
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. (Ret.) Kathleen Anne Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEARMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv04433
Plaintiff:
ZANDA SPEARMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 13-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
Evans v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv00656
Plaintiff:
Augustus H. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Cindy Wright, Rebecca McBride, Thomas Zanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
