Cases 1 - 10 of 120
USA v. Town of Thornapple, Wisconsin, et al
as 24-2931
Defendant:
TOM ZELM, ANGELA JOHNSON, RALPH C. KENYON and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv01682
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Angela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Town of Thornapple, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00664
Defendant:
Charidy Ludescher, Duane Biller, Angela Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Arnold v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Brigham Arnold
Defendant:
Angela Johnson, Sentry Insurance Company and ITG Holdings USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Angela Johnson
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Angela Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Brad Simpson
Defendant:
Angela Johnson, Shelley Santry, Claudette Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
