Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Chan et al v. Mamdani et al
as 1:2026cv05959
Plaintiff:
Yu Hin Chan and Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Zohran Mamdani, Bruce Blakeman, Saritha Komatireddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feifei Gu v. Donald Trump, et al
as 26-5196
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Honorable President, Letitia James, as NY Attorney General, Todd Blanche, as US Attorney General and others
Zhenbiao Zhang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2026cv04391
Plaintiff:
Zhenbiao Zhang
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A warm shop (7-14 days delivery_, Aizhuzhu-US and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Feifei Gu v. Donald Trump, et al
as 25-5466
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Honorable President, Letitia James, as NY Attorney General, Pamela J. Bondi, as US Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv11801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Feifei Gu v. Gina Abadi
as 25-2204
Plaintiff:
FEIFEI GU
Defendant:
GINA ABADI, RICHARD VELASQUEZ, LAWRENCE KNIPEL and others
Gu v. Abadi et al
as 1:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Gina Abadi, Richard Velasquez, Lawrence Knipel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Gu v. Abadi et al
as 1:2025cv05359
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Gina Abadi, Richard Velasquez, Lawrence Knipel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GU v. ABADI et al
as 2:2025cv01464
Plaintiff:
FEIFEI GU
Defendant:
GINA ABADI, RICHARD VELASQUEZ, LAWRENCE KNIPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gu v. Abadi et al
as 1:2025cv00467
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Gina Abadi, Richard Velasquez, Lawrence Knipel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.