Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Harrison v. USA
as 5:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
George Harrison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. George Harrison
as 23-6003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE HARRISON
Harrison v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
George Harrison
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14692
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22515
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
George Harrison
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81390
Plaintiff:
Willie Ard, Oswald Arellano, Kimberly Barnett and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim U.S.A. Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Willie Ard, Oswald Arellano, Kimberly Barnett and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Watkins v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, James W. Oxendine, Brenda Joy Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
