Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Carrick v. Mile High Equipment LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Steven Carrick
Defendant:
Mile High Equipment LLC doing business as Ice O Matic, Ali Group North America Corporation and R & E Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Heard v. eStem Jr High et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tamara Heard
Defendant:
eStem Jr High, John Bacon and Justin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lawrence et al v. Ringgold et al
as 4:2020cv00549
Defendant:
Rachelle Stewart, Amanda Powell McClain, Robert High and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Lawrence and James Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Wallace et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv00257
Plaintiff:
High Cotton Farms Inc, Bradley Wallace and WMA Farms Partnership
Defendant:
BASF SE, BASF Corporation and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashley v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00576
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Gary Arnold, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arras v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Tonya Parker, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Michael Arras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00578
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrew, Gary Arnold, Richard Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Robinson et al
as 4:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Meagan Burns, Mike Robinson, Tonya Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
