Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03688
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Chang v. Wang
as 26-2760
Plaintiff:
ZHE ZHAO and YONG JUN CHAO
:
SHANG SHING CHANG, JIE LI, XIAO XI XIE and others
Defendant:
CLEAN AIR CAR SERVICE & PARKING BRANCH TWO, LLC
Wang v. Lucky Seven Buffet Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00821
Plaintiff:
Ri Rong Wang
Defendant:
Lucky Seven Buffet Inc. doing business as Asian Buffet and Zhu Ming Lu individually doing business as Asian Buffet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01898
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
CHEN v. EDLOW et al
as 2:2026cv07297
Plaintiff:
MING CHEN
Defendant:
JOSEPH B. EDLOW, ANGELA KLAPAKIS, DAVID METCALF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wong v. Hyundai Motor America Inc
as 1:2026cv03051
Plaintiff:
Ming Wong
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10224
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
